This first lesson was an
eye-opener. Especially since I have done
this kind of thing before in an individual setting, but a group setting is
almost more like a performance in a way.
Routine, routine, keep it simple: with one or two goals at most. Also, I would like to ask more questions,
should have thought of that before. “How
many pieces do you see?” Oh, about
fifteen. Then perhaps “What do they look
like?” Another thing that Brandt
suggested that struck me was explaining things from the kid’s prospective, like
"Here's a piece of the instrument with three holes on one side, hold it
like this, with three fingers on the three holes. “ This makes a lot of sense in hind sight. I also got some good suggestions from my
fellow students. Yes, I do need to
loosen up a bit. I also thought of just
putting the reed on the mouthpiece, practice making an embouchure, and make
some sounds. At the suggestion of my
daughter’s band teacher here in New Haven I thought twice about that,
though. She doesn’t allow her students
to take the instruments home until the second week of lessons, until she is
sure all students can properly assemble the instrument without damaging
it. In the first week of lessons they
work on instrument assembly, then making the first sound on the
mouthpiece/barrel combination. Only once
they have accomplished these tasks can the students take the instruments
home. I realize this policy has
complications, although I imagine these are issues one establishes more firmly
when one has some experience building a program.
Monday, February 24, 2014
Sunday, February 23, 2014
Post #4: Responding to the Kohn article on rubrics
Rubrics seem to me to be an element that comes out of the “product”
oriented way of learning so common in schools today. Students are trained to “produce” according
to a strict set of standards, and in terms of assessment the product that comes
from the students is the only thing that counts. In this mode students don’t have to think
very much about what they are producing as long as the product they come up
with complies with the appropriate standards spelled out in the rubric. In instrumental music instruction the focus
on product gives rise to the “churning out” of performances that Brandt
Schneider mentions as the malaise of today’s music programs. Unfortunately I think the need to placate an administrator’s
hunger for data may mean that occasionally we music educators have to package
what we do with students in terms of a product.
However, let’s not lose sight of what is really important: the process
of learning music, learning to speak the musical language and actually have
something to say. This means providing
our students with a meaningful vehicle to improve their musicianship as well as
their technique, and most importantly have some fun doing it.
Monday, February 17, 2014
Blog Prompt #3
Blog Prompt #3
- Should music educators be experts in jazz or American folk
music?
- What American songs should all students know?
I
have a certain hesitancy in responding to this prompt that I hope will be met
with some understanding on the part of the reader. Let me first state that I believe music
educators should find whatever means necessary to build their student’s aural
understanding of music, and if this endeavor can be met through the teacher’s
use of American popular music, traditional or otherwise, I applaud such an
endeavor. We, as music educators, should
be able to involve students musically on a level that students can relate to,
and with many of our students American popular music will provide such a
medium. However, as music educators we
need to engage all our students, no matter what their nationality, in a musically
meaningful manner. In this endeavor I
believe that the nationalities of each of our students should be put on equal
footing, and be explored in such a manner.
I relate passionately to a performance I took part in last fall (October
2013) at the Worthington-Hooker School in New Haven, where folk-songs, stories,
and dances from nations all across the seven continents of the world, each
represented by students in the various classes, were presented on stage. One of the songs all students learned for the
performance was the German round Froh zu
sein, which they first sung in solfege with hand syllables, and then with
the German text in canon. This is just
one of the songs I believe the students benefited from learning, not just
musically, but culturally in general.
I
bring this situation up because I believe that “American” music definitely has
something special to offer the music classroom, however for certain students
Indian folk music, or Italian folk music, or Chinese folk music, or Brazilian
folk music, might have equal meaning in that it provides the vehicle for those
students to become better musicians.
Finally I must relate the story of my wife, a music educator born in
Germany, who took a job as a string teacher in a relatively rural community in
Connecticut with a string program of twenty students at the time, and has built
it to a program with well over two hundred.
Some of her most devoted students can tell the story of her listening to
a recording of the Indian national anthem on YOU-TUBE and then writing a
four-part version for her orchestra to play.
The strength of her program definitely comes from her sensitivity to
cultural diversity, as well as her plain passion for music.
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Blog Post #2
Brandt Schneider "Creating Musical Flexibility Through the
Ensemble"
- Critique the article.
- How do we determine that someone is a good musician?
I enjoyed this article
very much because it challenged me to create a curriculum where my students are
building an aural understanding of music rather than mere key pushing
skills. Bach chorales are one good
vehicle for such a style of learning because the voices tend to develop
linearly, i.e. primarily through stepwise motion, and are thus are comprehended
and absorbed in an aural fashion more easily.
Having students learn each of the four chorale voices in a variety of
keys not only supports their mastery of the melodic content of the chorale
(horizontal comprehension), it lays the groundwork for them to understand the
harmonic structure as well (comprehension of vertical progression). This is a skill I am always stressing to my
theory students: to develop an aural comprehension of the theory topics we are
covering, and then apply these concepts to music they are working on. The model Schneider creates allows the
instrumental (or vocal) ensemble to become a laboratory for learning theory
concepts in an applied setting, thus bridging the divide between “theory class”
and the ensemble setting. While not all
theoretical concepts may lend themselves to this model just yet, I believe that
this style of learning is invaluable for students as they increase their
instrumental-vocal skills. How do we
determine if someone is a “good” musician?
Perhaps one yardstick of such a value designation is if an
instrumentalist can get beyond the mere technical necessities of their
instrument while playing music to a true aural understanding of the music being
played. Do they have an understanding of
the vocabulary and grammar of their music, or as Ken Trapp said “are they merely barking the notes?”
Monday, February 3, 2014
Ideas on the Boonshaft reading
My Credo in Relation to the Boonshaft Reading
Oliver Homann
I
am a musician who enjoys sharing my knowledge and skills with others. My primary instruments are oboe and English
horn, and these are the instruments I perform on, although I enjoy exploring
other instruments as well, and use some of these for teaching purposes. These secondary instruments include clarinet,
saxophone, recorder, and keyboard. For
some years now I have coached woodwinds and taught music theory at the
Educational Center for the Arts, an inter-district arts magnet school in New
Haven, CT. Previously I studied at
Northwestern University, the College-Conservatory of Music in Cincinnati, Yale
University, and finally at the City University of New York, where I received a
D.M.A. in oboe performance. I have also
studied at the Hochschule fuer Musik in Mannheim, Germany, and played
professionally with orchestras in Mexico for several years.
I
believe that something I have to offer to students through my teaching comes
from my passion for music, my knowledge of music both theoretical and
historical, as well as my years of performance experience at the professional
level. Peter Boonshaft quotes George
Carlin: “It’s not enough to know which notes to play, you have to know why they
need to be played.” While Boonshaft relates
Carlin’s comments to the art of conducting and really knowing a score, I
believe we can extend these ideas to music-making in general, especially for
students. Music is, after all, a
language, and in order to communicate successfully, students need to know “why
[notes] need to be played”, which has a lot to do with the when, where, who,
and how of the music as well.
I
believe that music can enrich people’s lives in a unique manner. While music can be studied on a theoretical
and historical level, it is first and foremost an activity, it’s something we
do. Yes knowing is important, but this
act of doing, of making music seems to be the glue that holds things together
for my students. We can see the
importance of doing in Boonshaft’s
observations on percussionists, who in certain circumstances have the potential
to not be fully engaged in the rehearsal.
In order to engage percussionists that may not have a part to play
Boonshaft creates “air drums” to keep the players focused on the music making
at hand. This concept of engagement goes
well beyond the realm of rehearsals, of course.
Especially in areas such as music theory, where learning has a tendency
to get bogged down in heady concepts, involving as much “doing” as possible can
make the class more successful. In
covering counterpoint, for example, I try to have my students sing as many of
the examples as possible before we start talking about intervallic
relationships between the counterpoint lines.
In
the end I value good music. I value
guiding students to achieve more in the pursuit of good music. I believe that every student can achieve
something positive when engaged in this pursuit. I really enjoyed Boonshaft’s words about his
mother, an artist who had framed the following passage in her studio: “The bearer of these presents is
Michelangelo, the sculptor. His nature
is such that he requires to be drawn out by kindness and encouragement. But if love be shown him and he is well
treated, he will accomplish things that will make the whole world wonder.” My goal with my teaching is to provide each
student with the support they need to more fully realize their potential.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)